| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384 |
- #ifndef WII_EC_MACROS_H_
- #define WII_EC_MACROS_H_
- //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
- // CHECK MACROS
- //
- // I don't generally like this style of coding - it just (generally) makes things nightmarish to debug
- // However, on this occasion I think it's a good choice (to make adding controllers LESS bug-prone)
- //
- //if (furi_message_queue_get_count(queue) > 18) WARN("queue high %d", furi_message_queue_get_count(queue));
- #define MSGQ(lbl) do { \
- msg.wiiEc.in = lbl; \
- furi_message_queue_put(queue, &msg, 0); \
- }while(0)
- // A 'standard' "button" is an independent SPST switch
- // Eg. Nunchuck 'Z' button
- // The "value" will always be 0
- #define BUTTON(btn,lbl) do { \
- if (new->btn != old->btn) { \
- msg.wiiEc.type = (new->btn) ? WIIEC_PRESS : WIIEC_RELEASE; \
- msg.wiiEc.val = 0; \
- MSGQ(lbl); \
- } \
- }while(0)
- // An "analogue button" is an SPST coupled with an ananlogue 'switch'
- // Eg. The "bottom out" switches on the triggers of the classic controller
- // The "value" will be the value of the associated analogue controller
- #define ANABTN(btn,ana,lbl) do { \
- if (new->btn != old->btn) { \
- msg.wiiEc.type = (new->btn) ? WIIEC_PRESS : WIIEC_RELEASE; \
- msg.wiiEc.val = new->ana; \
- MSGQ(lbl); \
- } \
- }while(0)
- #define ANALOG(ana,lbl) do { \
- if (new->ana != old->ana) { \
- msg.wiiEc.type = WIIEC_ANALOG; \
- msg.wiiEc.val = new->ana; \
- MSGQ(lbl); \
- } \
- }while(0)
- #define ACCEL(acc,lbl) do { \
- if (new->acc != old->acc) { \
- msg.wiiEc.type = WIIEC_ACCEL; \
- msg.wiiEc.val = new->acc; \
- MSGQ(lbl); \
- } \
- }while(0)
- //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
- // CALIBRATION MACROS
- //
- // Again ...I totally agree with anyone who says "MACRO coding" is (gernally) a poor choice of programming style
- // But something about this code is making it soooo appealing
- //
- // ... v=variable, n=number
- //
- #define FACTORY_LO(v,n) do{ (dst[1]. v) = n; }while(0)
- #define FACTORY_MID(v,n) do{ (dst[2]. v) = n; }while(0)
- #define FACTORY_HI(v,n) do{ (dst[3]. v) = n; }while(0)
- #define TRACK_LO(v) do{ if ((src-> v) < (dst[0]. v)) (dst[0]. v) = (src-> v); }while(0)
- #define TRACK_HI(v) do{ if ((src-> v) > (dst[4]. v)) (dst[4]. v) = (src-> v); }while(0)
- #define TRACK_LO_HI(v) do{ TRACK_LO(v); TRACK_HI(v); }while(0)
- #define RESET_LO(v,b) do{ (dst[0]. v) = (dst[1]. v) = ((1<<(b))-1); }while(0)
- #define RESET_HI(v) do{ (dst[4]. v) = (dst[3]. v) = 0; }while(0)
- #define RESET_MID(v) do{ (dst[2]. v) = (src-> v); }while(0)
- #define RESET_LO_HI(v,b) do{ RESET_LO(v,b); RESET_HI(v); }while(0)
- #define RESET_LO_MID_HI(v,b) do{ RESET_LO(v,b); RESET_MID(v); RESET_HI(v); }while(0)
- #define RANGE_LO(v) do{ if ((src-> v) < (dst[1]. v)) (dst[1]. v) = (src-> v); }while(0)
- #define RANGE_HI(v) do{ if ((src-> v) > (dst[3]. v)) (dst[3]. v) = (src-> v); }while(0)
- #define RANGE_LO_HI(v) do{ RANGE_LO(v); RANGE_HI(v); }while(0)
- #define CENTRE(v) do{ (dst[2]. v) = (src-> v); } while(0)
- #endif //WII_EC_MACROS_H_
|