| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133 |
- """Tests for the per-VP FTP passive-port slice helper (#1646).
- Each VP is allocated a non-overlapping 10-port slice from the
- PASSIVE_PORT_BASE pool. Bridge-mode Docker users only have to expose
- `PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE * N_vps` ports instead of the historical 1001-port
- pool that spawned ~2000 docker-proxy host processes (~3.5 GB RAM).
- Slicing properties pinned here:
- - Slice 0 covers PASSIVE_PORT_BASE..+SLICE_SIZE-1 (the only slice that
- aligns with the compose file's narrowest default exposure).
- - Each subsequent vp_id advances by exactly SLICE_SIZE — no overlap, no
- gap.
- - vp_ids beyond MAX_SLOTS wrap around (modulo) so installs that have
- churned through many VPs over time still produce a valid in-range
- slice; same-slot collisions fall back to the per-session 10-attempt
- random retry, which is the same behaviour as pre-#1646.
- - Defensive: a non-positive vp_id (shouldn't occur, but DBs are
- surprising) clamps to slot 0 rather than producing a negative port.
- """
- from __future__ import annotations
- import pytest
- from backend.app.services.virtual_printer.ftp_server import (
- PASSIVE_MAX_SLOTS,
- PASSIVE_PORT_BASE,
- PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE,
- compute_passive_port_slice,
- )
- class TestComputePassivePortSlice:
- def test_vp_id_one_starts_at_base(self):
- port_min, port_max = compute_passive_port_slice(1)
- assert port_min == PASSIVE_PORT_BASE
- assert port_max == PASSIVE_PORT_BASE + PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE - 1
- def test_consecutive_vp_ids_get_adjacent_non_overlapping_slices(self):
- slice1_min, slice1_max = compute_passive_port_slice(1)
- slice2_min, slice2_max = compute_passive_port_slice(2)
- slice3_min, slice3_max = compute_passive_port_slice(3)
- assert slice1_max + 1 == slice2_min # no gap
- assert slice2_max + 1 == slice3_min # no gap
- # Slice width matches the constant — no off-by-one.
- assert slice1_max - slice1_min + 1 == PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE
- assert slice2_max - slice2_min + 1 == PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE
- assert slice3_max - slice3_min + 1 == PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE
- def test_no_two_distinct_vp_ids_within_max_slots_share_a_port(self):
- seen: dict[int, int] = {}
- for vp_id in range(1, PASSIVE_MAX_SLOTS + 1):
- lo, hi = compute_passive_port_slice(vp_id)
- for port in range(lo, hi + 1):
- assert port not in seen, f"VP {vp_id} clashes with VP {seen[port]} on port {port}"
- seen[port] = vp_id
- def test_wraps_modulo_max_slots(self):
- """VP id past MAX_SLOTS lands on the same slice as its modulo-N
- neighbour — the per-session retry handles the rare collision."""
- first = compute_passive_port_slice(1)
- wrapped = compute_passive_port_slice(PASSIVE_MAX_SLOTS + 1)
- assert wrapped == first
- def test_top_slot_is_within_base_pool(self):
- """The last valid slot must stay below PASSIVE_PORT_BASE +
- MAX_SLOTS*SLICE_SIZE so the slice never escapes the pool that
- the docker-compose comments document for users."""
- _, hi = compute_passive_port_slice(PASSIVE_MAX_SLOTS)
- assert hi < PASSIVE_PORT_BASE + PASSIVE_MAX_SLOTS * PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE
- @pytest.mark.parametrize("bad_id", [0, -1, -999])
- def test_non_positive_ids_clamp_to_slot_zero(self, bad_id):
- """Defensive: a bad vp_id from a corrupted row mustn't produce a
- negative port and crash asyncio.start_server."""
- assert compute_passive_port_slice(bad_id) == compute_passive_port_slice(1)
- class TestFTPServerHonoursPerInstanceRange:
- """`VirtualPrinterFTPServer` now stores the slice on `self`. Two
- instances constructed with different slices must hand each
- `FTPSession` the right per-instance range — no class-level leak."""
- def test_two_instances_independent_ranges(self, tmp_path):
- from backend.app.services.virtual_printer.ftp_server import VirtualPrinterFTPServer
- cert = tmp_path / "cert.pem"
- cert.write_text("not a real cert")
- key = tmp_path / "key.pem"
- key.write_text("not a real key")
- a = VirtualPrinterFTPServer(
- upload_dir=tmp_path,
- access_code="x",
- cert_path=cert,
- key_path=key,
- passive_port_min=50000,
- passive_port_max=50009,
- )
- b = VirtualPrinterFTPServer(
- upload_dir=tmp_path,
- access_code="x",
- cert_path=cert,
- key_path=key,
- passive_port_min=50050,
- passive_port_max=50059,
- )
- assert (a.passive_port_min, a.passive_port_max) == (50000, 50009)
- assert (b.passive_port_min, b.passive_port_max) == (50050, 50059)
- # Mutating one must not affect the other (regression guard against
- # the pre-fix class-constant layout).
- b.passive_port_min = 60000
- assert a.passive_port_min == 50000
- def test_default_construction_gives_a_one_slice_window(self, tmp_path):
- """A consumer that doesn't pass passive_port_min/max should still
- get a valid, minimal range — handy for tests and direct callers."""
- from backend.app.services.virtual_printer.ftp_server import VirtualPrinterFTPServer
- cert = tmp_path / "cert.pem"
- cert.write_text("x")
- key = tmp_path / "key.pem"
- key.write_text("x")
- server = VirtualPrinterFTPServer(
- upload_dir=tmp_path,
- access_code="x",
- cert_path=cert,
- key_path=key,
- )
- assert server.passive_port_min == PASSIVE_PORT_BASE
- assert server.passive_port_max - server.passive_port_min + 1 == PASSIVE_SLICE_SIZE
|